NO
(ignored inputs)COMMENT from experiments for [44] submitted by: Tsubasa Suzuki , Takahito Aoto , and Yoshihito Toyama
input TRS:
   [ a(?x) -> g(g(b(?x))),
     a(?x) -> g(c(?x)),
     b(?x) -> g(b(?x)) ]
TRS:
   [ a(?x) -> g(g(b(?x))),
     a(?x) -> g(c(?x)),
     b(?x) -> g(b(?x)) ]
New rules by rule reversing:
   [ g(g(b(?x))) -> a(?x),
     a(?x) -> g(c(?x)),
     b(?x) -> b(?x),
     g(b(?x)) -> b(?x) ]
constructed TRS:
   [ g(g(b(?x))) -> a(?x),
     a(?x) -> g(c(?x)),
     b(?x) -> b(?x),
     g(b(?x)) -> b(?x),
     g(b(?x_3)) -> g(c(?x_3)),
     a(?x_3) -> g(c(?x_3)),
     a(?x_4) -> g(g(c(?x_4))),
     b(?x_3) -> g(c(?x_3)) ]
convertible distinct normal forms: g(c(?x_5)) = g(g(c(?x_5)))
UNC Completion (Development Closed)
problems/238.trs: Success(not UNC)
(4 msec.)